BB has today posted on the Google acquisition of Youtube and the much-hyped 'fact' that the acquisition was on a price/revenue multiple of 100.
A few thoughts:
- I am surprised the multiple isn't higher... youtube would at the time of acquisition have been generating f-all revenue... it clearly wasn't bought on the basis of present revenue, but on the basis of its clear leadership of a segment in which google would consider itself the natural leader
- it is inconceivable that the price/revenue multiple would have been the deciding factor (or even a relevant factor) in determining the purchase price or the valuation. a very early stage (almost pre-revenue) company like youtube can only really be valued on the basis of its potential or else on raw belief / hype... multiples of any kind are largely meaningless
- BB writes that $1.2b of the purchase price is assigned to goodwill. From my M&A experience, 'goodwill' is that part of the purchase price that doesn't fit anywhere else... you can't fairly call it a tangible asset (eg. a computer, a chair) or an identifiable intangible asset (eg. the copyright in a software program, a trade mark). Although of course I do not hold myself out as an expert on accounting for intangibles under US accounting rules.
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Goodwill
Monday, March 05, 2007
Sunday, March 04, 2007
(self-)censored almost to a crisp
Well, I survived my bucks' night (query appropriateness of the apostrophe). And early reports are emerging - BB, the man for whom the phrase unreliable narrator was coined, provides a version of events here
I planned to write my impressions of the evening but after some minutes work have given up the task as impossible due to haziness of memory, the necessity for self-censorship and the varied humiliations involved.
Posted by
samizdat7
at
9:35 pm
0
comments
Monday, February 12, 2007
Awesome blog post by BB
Everyone should read this blog post by BB... the madness has the unmistakeable ring of truth. With perhaps a touch of Easton Ellis - hey Ben - have you been rereading Lunar Park - or perhaps a little Glamorama?
7/2/7- 1930hrs: Half hour late, apologies. ninemsn home page and discussion of the attention economy ensues. freelance vs relocal'g to sf gulch vs bronte views. no ladies and gentlemen this is not a bubble, but there's some interesting people with some interesting views wandering around the corridors. they may be stalkrs.
Posted by
samizdat7
at
8:28 pm
0
comments
Labels: bb